Informatized warfare of China is the implementation of information warfare (IW) within the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and other organizations affiliated or controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Laid out in the Chinese Defence White Paper of 2008,[1] informatized warfare includes the utilization of information-based weapons and forces, including battlefield management systems, precision-strike capabilities, and technology-assisted command and control (C4ISR).[2] However, some media and analyst reports also uses the term to describe propaganda and influence operations efforts of the Chinese state.[3]


The People's Liberation Army (PLA) defines the term informatization to describe the implementation of information technology in the digital age, and as an evaluation criteria of its military modernization effort. The Central Military Commission aims to transform PLA from conducting people's war to engage in warfare conditions of informatization, which includes moving the military doctrine from weapon platform-centric to cyber-centric. The indicated characteristic of the cyber-centric force is the utilization of network linkages (data-link) among platforms.[4]

Eric C. Anderson and Jeffrey G. Engstrom define "informationization" and informatized warfare in Chinese military doctrine as follows: "[A]t the operational level appears focused on providing an integrated platform for joint war-zone command, control, communications, computer, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) connectivity, and for peacetime command and control (C2) within the PLA’s Military Regions."[2]

The United States Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) defines China's "informatized warfare" as similar to U.S. military's concept of net-centric capability, which means the military's capability to use advanced information technology and communications systems to gain operational advantage over an adversary.[5]

In 1995, the father of Chinese information warfare, Major General Wang Pufeng, wrote "Information war is a crucial stage of high-tech war... At its heart are information technologies, fusing intelligence war, strategic war, electronic war, guided missile war, a war of "motorization" [jidong zhan], a war of firepower [huoli]—a total war. It is a new type of warfare."[6]

In two articles in the People's Liberation Army Daily, of 13 and 20 June 1995, Senior Colonel Wang Baocun and Li Fei of the Academy of Military Science noted several definitions. They concluded:

'We hold that information warfare has both narrow and broad meanings. Information warfare in the narrow sense refers to the U.S. military's so-called "battlefield information warfare," the crux of which is "command and control warfare." It is defined as the comprehensive use, with intelligence support, of military deception, operational secrecy, psychological warfare, electronic warfare, and substantive destruction to assault the enemy's whole information system including personnel; and to disrupt the enemy's information flow, in order to impact, weaken, and destroy the enemy's command and control capability, while keeping one's own command and control capability from being affected by similar enemy actions.'[7]

They went on to state:

The essential substance of information warfare in the narrow sense is made up of five major elements and two general areas.

The five major elements are:

The two general areas are information protection (defense) and information attack (offense):

A July 1998 conference held in San Diego, sponsored jointly by the RAND Center for Asia-Pacific Policy and the Taiwan-based Chinese Council of Advanced Policy Studies, "brought together Chinese military experts to discuss the non-hardware side of the People's Liberation Army's modernization."[6] In his presentation, James C. Mulvenon stated: "Chinese writings clearly suggest that IW is a solely military subject, and as such, they draw inspiration primarily from U.S. military writings. The net result of this "borrowing" is that many PLA authors' definitions of IW and IW concepts sound eerily familiar."[6]: 175–186 

In December 1999, Xie Guang, the then Vice Minister of Science & Technology and Industry for National Defence, defined IW as:

"IW in military sense means overall use of various types (of) information technologies, equipment and systems, particularly his command systems, to shake determination of enemy’s policy makers and at the same time, the use of all the means possible to ensure that that one’s own systems are not damaged or disturbed".[8]

In a strategic analysis paper for the Indian Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses written in 2006, Vinod Anand examines the definitions of Chinese Information Warfare.[8] He notes that although Chinese understanding of IW was initially based on western concepts, it has increasingly moved towards evolving its own orientation.[9]

Background and characteristics

Further information: Unrestricted Warfare and Three warfares

China's interest in information warfare began after the United States victory in the first Gulf War (1990–1991). U.S. success was the result of information technologies and the total dominance it was able to provide in the battle space.[10] From that point forward, the PLA began to seriously invest in and develop its own concepts of information warfare and what they mean to China.

As a result of technological advancement, China has now entered an era where informationization can be applied to military domains.[8][11]

China's 2004 White Paper on National Defense outlines the importance of informationization.

"The PLA, aiming at building an informationalised force and winning an information war, deepens its reforms, dedicates itself to innovation, improves its quality and actively pushes forward the RMA with Chinese characteristics with informationalization at its core."[8]

The U.S. Department of Defense's 2009 Annual Report to Congress on "Military Power of the People's Republic of China" defines local wars under conditions of informationization as "high intensity and short duration fighting against high technology adversaries" ... "capable of fighting and winning short-duration, high-intensity conflicts along its periphery against high-tech adversaries".[12] Additionally, local war under informationization is an effort which seeks to fully develop and link land, air, sea, space and the electromagnetic spectrum into one system.[13] China's military strategy is focused on fighting and winning "informationized local wars."[14]

China's leadership has continuously stressed using asymmetric techniques to counter more powerful nations, such as the United States, and information warfare is a tool that the PLA uses to achieve their goals.[15][16] In a 2001 paper in the U.S. Military Review, T. L. Thomas examines the writings of Major General Dai Qingmin (Director of the PLA's Communications Department of the General Staff responsible for IW and IO), Senior Colonel Wang Baocun (of the PLA's Academy of Military Sciences) and others on the ways that China is employing "Electronic Strategies" to realise the benefits of asymmetric warfare. Thomas also summarises the April 2000 issue of the Chinese journal China Military Science which contains three articles on information warfare subjects. The only article written in English ("The Current Revolution in Military Affairs and its Impact on Asia-Pacific Security," by Senior Colonel Wang Baocun) presents a quite different approach to an article Wang Baocun wrote only three years previously where he presented a description of IW which contained the elements of Soviet/Russian military science.[17]

In the article "On Information Warfare Strategies", by Major General Niu Li, Colonel Li Jiangzhou and Major Xu Dehui (of the Communications and Command Institute), the authors define IW stratagems as "schemes and methods devised and used by commanders and commanding bodies to seize and maintain information supremacy on the basis of using clever methods to prevail at a relatively small cost in information warfare."[18]

In 2003, the CCP approved the three warfares strategy for the PLA, which involves using public opinion (or media) warfare, psychological warfare and legal warfare (lawfare).[19]

While China has adopted the idea of information dominance, its method for going about information dominance differs, using ancient political warfare methods such as the Thirty-Six Stratagems.[20][16] The PLA has also increasingly stressed an operational concept called "cognitive domain operations."[21]

On the defensive side, China employs a combination of legal policies and information technology for censorship and surveillance of dissenters in a program called Golden Shield.[22] This is often referred to as the Great Firewall of China. China promotes the idea of "national cyber sovereignty," which Xi Jinping has described as the avoidance of "cyber hegemony" and the idea that countries should respect each other's national security in cyberspace.[23]

Information operations

Pro-China disinformation campaigns in 2021 showed greater sophistication compared to 2019. It has been difficult to attribute with certainty whether Chinese state actors are behind these actions.[24]


Further information: COVID-19 misinformation by China

Disinformation campaigns sought to downplay the emergence of COVID-19 in China and manipulate information about its spread around the world.[25][26] In January 2023, Google stated that it shut down more than 50,000 accounts promoting disinformation about COVID-19, Taiwan, and U.S. politics. The campaign is believed to be linked to Chinese public relations firm Shanghai Haixun Technology Co.[27] Haixun has planted pro-Beijing stories in dozens of American news outlets online.[28]


Further information: United front in Taiwan and Anti-Infiltration Act

The PRC seeks unification with Taiwan and uses information operations, sometimes referred to as "information war", as an important part of that work.[29][30] Despite the large resource outlay the Chinese have been relatively ineffective in influencing the Taiwanese public.[31] According to James C. Mulvenon rather than risk failure of a militarily forced unification, which could lead to international recognition of the independence of Taiwan, PRC leadership could potentially use computer network operations to undermine the will of Taiwan by attacking Taiwanese infrastructure.[32]

In 2022 Taiwan's Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau revealed that it had identified more than 400 social media accounts being used to push disinformation to Taiwanese citizens as part of Chinese content farms.[33] In 2023, the Investigation Bureau announced that it was monitoring for money laundering undertaken in an effort to finance election interference in Taiwan.[34]

During the 2022 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan, Taiwanese officials accused the PLA of engaging in information warfare with claims of military exercises close to Penghu.[35]

United States

See also: Chinese espionage in the United States and Foreign electoral intervention

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been carrying out propaganda against the West since the 1960s, spreading its ideology and creating division among the population. Its foreign-directed propaganda has been known to back far-left political activists and radical feminism.[36][37][38]

Using a variety of methods, the PRC has recruited American agents of influence to advocate for Chinese interests in the United States. While many of these agents of influence serve China unwittingly, they can be very effective. A 1999 Congressional report found that "the Chinese Government continues to seek influence in Congress through various means, including inviting Congressional members to visit the PRC, lobbying ethnic Chinese voters and prominent U.S. citizens, and engaging U.S. business interests to weigh in on issues of mutual concern."[39]

China also uses its vast market as leverage in order to persuade American companies to lobby for Chinese interests. This is especially true of companies that deal in high technology or dual-use technology, as there are significant export controls placed on such technology. According to the 1999 Cox Report, "Executives wishing to do business in the PRC share a mutual commercial interest with the PRC in minimizing export controls on dual-use and military-related technologies. The PRC has displayed a willingness to exploit this mutuality of interest in several notoriously public cases by inducing VIPs from large U.S. companies to lobby on behalf of initiatives, such as export liberalization, on which they are aligned with the PRC."[40]

Chinese government information operations have also attempted to co-opt local NIMBY sentiment to drive opposition against perceived economic threats such as the development projects that compete with the rare earth industry in China.[41]

In 2024 Network Contagion reported that several member organizations of the pro-Palestinian movement Shut It Down for Palestine (SID4P) are linked to what it calls the "Singham Network" under Neville Roy Singham, who has close ties to the CCP according to Network Contagion.[42] The report accuses the Singham Network of stoking unrest at the grassroot level and amplifying the voice of SID4P and says that at least one member of SID4P has ties to extremist groups with anti-American, anti-Israel, and anti-Jewish agendas.[42]

U.S. elections

See also: 1996 United States campaign finance controversy

Through its agents in America, the PRC has financed a number of political candidates. Katrina Leung, a Chinese spy, contributed $10,000 to the campaign of Richard Riordan, the former mayor of Los Angeles. When he lost his primary to Bill Simon Jr., Leung contributed $4,200 to Simon's campaign. At the direction of her Chinese handlers, Leung also contributed to the 1992 campaign of George H. W. Bush. It is estimated that Leung donated around $27,000 to politicians in the 1990s on behalf of the PRC.[43]

A 2012 report by the Government Accountability Institute[44] cites other examples: It was discovered that officers from the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C. "sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the Democratic National Committee before the 1996 presidential campaign."[45] While these allegations have been denied by the PRC, "Secret communications between Beijing and the Chinese Embassy in Washington establish that the influence-buying plan was 'government sanctioned...'"[46]

In 1996, People's Liberation Army intelligence officer Gen. Ji Shengde provided Johnny Chung, a fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee, with $300,000 to donate towards President Bill Clinton's reelection. Chung visited the White House over fifty times during the 1996 presidential campaign, and was responsible for over $400,000 of contributions to the DNC.[47]

In September 2022, Meta Platforms removed fake accounts linked to a China-based influence operation ahead of the 2022 United States elections.[48][49] In the run-up to the 2024 United States elections, the Ministry of Public Security's Spamouflage influence operation was identified as having used fake social media accounts in an attempt to amplify divisions in US society.[50]

Russian invasion of Ukraine

Further information: China and the Russian invasion of Ukraine and Ukraine bioweapons conspiracy theory

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, state news agency Xinhua and other Chinese state media outlets paid for digital ads on Facebook amplifying pro-Kremlin disinformation and propaganda after Meta Platforms banned Russian state media advertisement buys.[51][52][53][54] In March 2022, China Global Television Network repeated unsubstantiated Russian claims of biological weapons labs in Ukraine.[55][56][57] The CCP-owned tabloid Global Times also echoed Russian state media claims that the Bucha massacre was staged.[58]

Other regions

The Times of India reported that during the 2017 Doklam standoff China used information operations against India.[59]

In 2020, Facebook took down a network of inauthentic accounts that, according to Graphika, were attributed to individuals in China. The information campaign focused on politics in Southeast Asia and was dubbed "Operation Naval Gazing" by security researchers.[60][61]

Other platforms

In June 2020, Twitter shut down 23,750 primary accounts and approximately 150,000 booster accounts which were being used by China to conduct an information operation aimed at boosting China's global position during the COVID-19 outbreak as well as attacking traditional targets such as Hong Kong pro-democracy activists, Guo Wengui, and Taiwan.[62][63] Twitter said that the accounts had pushed deceptive narratives and spread propaganda.[64]

In 2020 Google removed over 2,500 YouTube accounts linked to China. Most of them uploaded spam-like content unrelated to politics, but a subset posted content primarily in Chinese about COVID-19 and racial protests in the United States.[65][66]

See also


  1. ^ "China's National Defense in 2008" (PDF). Federation of American Scientists. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2021. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  2. ^ a b Dr. Eric C. Anderson; Mr. Jeffrey G. Engstrom. "Capabilities of the Chinese People's Liberation Army to Carry Out Military Action in the Event of a Regional Military Conflict" (PDF). U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 October 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  3. ^ DiResta, Renée (20 July 2020). "Telling China's Story: The Chinese Communist Party's Campaign to Shape Global Narratives" (PDF). Stanford University; Hoover Institution. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2020. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
  4. ^ A. Bitzinger, Richard (27 February 2018). "China's love affair with 'informatized warfare'". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  5. ^ "China Military Power" (PDF). Defense Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 May 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  6. ^ a b c Mulvenon, James (1999). "The PLA and Information Warfare". In Mulvenon, James C.; Yang, Richard H. (eds.). The People's Liberation Army in the Information Age. RAND Corporation. doi:10.7249/cf145. ISBN 978-0-8330-2716-0.
  7. ^ a b "INFORMATION WARFARE - Senior Colonel Wang Baocun and Li Fei". Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  8. ^ a b c d Anand, Vinod (October 2006). "Chinese Concepts and Capabilities of Information Warfare". Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. Archived from the original on 22 March 2023. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  9. ^ Sobiesk, Edward (5 April 2003). "Redefining the Role of Information Warfare in Chinese Strategy". SANS Institute. Archived from the original on 9 February 2023. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  10. ^ Ventre, Daniel (18 May 2010). "China's Strategy for Information Warfare: A Focus on Energy". Journal of Energy Security. Archived from the original on 5 October 2011. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  11. ^ Ferguson, MAJ Robyn E. "Information Warfare with Chinese Characteristics: China's Future of Information Warfare and Strategic Culture." Archived 12 April 2010 at the Wayback Machine Masters Thesis, US Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, 2002. (Accessed 23 April 2011)
  12. ^ U.S. Department of Defense, Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2009 Archived 23 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine , Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, D.C. (Accessed 28 April 2011).
  13. ^ Krekel, Bryan (16 October 2009). "Capability of the People's Republic of China to Conduct Cyber Warfare and Computer Network Exploitation" (PDF). Prepared for The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2011.
  14. ^ "Is China a military superpower?". CSIS China Power. 24 February 2016. Archived from the original on 20 September 2016. Retrieved 25 August 2016.
  15. ^ Toshi Yoshihara, Chinese information warfare: a phantom menace or emerging threat? Archived 10 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine , Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, PA, November 2001. ISBN 1-58487-074-5 (Accessed 23 April 2011)
  16. ^ a b Wang, Vincent (1 January 2002). "Asymmetric War? Implications for China's Information Warfare Strategies". American Asian Review. 20: 167–207. Archived from the original on 21 July 2020. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
  17. ^ LtCol Timothy L. Thomas, US Army, Retired, "47 China's Electronic Strategies" Archived 10 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine , Military Review, May–June 2001
  18. ^ Niu Li, Li Jiangzhou, and Xu Dehui, "On Information Warfare Stratagems," Beijing Zhongguo Junshi Kexue, 12 January 2001, 115-22. Translated and downloaded from /f_049.htm FBIS[permanent dead link].
  19. ^ Fritz, Jason R. (21 March 2017). China's Cyber Warfare: The Evolution of Strategic Doctrine. Lexington Books. p. 70. ISBN 978-1-4985-3708-7. Archived from the original on 25 May 2024. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
  20. ^ Michael Pillsbury, ed., China Debates the Future Security Environment (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, 2000), 293.
  21. ^ Jackson, Smith; Beauchamp-Mustafaga, Nathan. "PLA Social Media Warfare and the Cognitive Domain". China Brief. Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 29 September 2023. Retrieved 10 September 2023.
  22. ^ Denyer, Simon (2016). "China's Scary Lesson To the World: Internet Censorship Works". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 6 December 2018. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  23. ^ "Xi calls for 'cyber sovereignty'". BBC News. 16 December 2015. Archived from the original on 2 September 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  24. ^ Cook, Sarah. "Beijing Is Getting Better at Disinformation on Global Social Media". The Diplomat. The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 29 March 2021. Retrieved 29 March 2021. Conclusively attributing inauthentic networks of social media accounts to Chinese party-state actors is exceedingly difficult, even when they are clearly promoting Beijing's preferred narratives or specific state-produced content.
  25. ^ Cook, Sarah. "Welcome to the New Era of Chinese Government Disinformation". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 29 March 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  26. ^ Wong, Edward; Rosenberg, Matthew; Barnes, Julian E. (22 April 2020). "Chinese Agents Helped Spread Messages That Sowed Virus Panic in U.S., Officials Say". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 4 April 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2021. As the messages have sown confusion, it has been difficult to trace their true origins or pin down all the ways in which they have been amplified.
  27. ^ Creig, Jonathan (26 January 2023). "Google shut down thousands of pro-Beijing disinformation channels on Taiwan, COVID-19". The Record. Recorded Future. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  28. ^ Cadell, Cate; Starks, Tim (24 July 2023). "Pro-China influence campaign infiltrates U.S. news websites". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 16 December 2023. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
  29. ^ Doshi, Rush (15 January 2020). "China Steps Up Its Information War in Taiwan". Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 6 October 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  30. ^ Hung, Tzu-Chieh; Hung, Tzu-Wei (19 July 2022). "How China's Cognitive Warfare Works: A Frontline Perspective of Taiwan's Anti-Disinformation Wars". Journal of Global Security Studies. 7 (4). doi:10.1093/jogss/ogac016. ISSN 2057-3170.
  31. ^ Prasso, Sheridan; Ellis, Samson (23 October 2019). "China's Information War on Taiwan Ramps Up as Election Nears". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 14 October 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  32. ^ James C. Mulvenon. "Chinese Information Operations Strategies in a Taiwan Contingency" Archived 3 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine , 15 September 2005. (Accessed 20 March 2011).
  33. ^ Li-chung, Chien (24 January 2022). "PRC targets Taiwan with new disinformation ploy". Taipei Times. Archived from the original on 23 January 2022. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  34. ^ "MJIB eyes China cash ahead of elections". Taipei Times. 20 November 2023. Archived from the original on 21 November 2023. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  35. ^ Tung, Roger (16 August 2022). "Taiwan accuses China of exaggeration with islands footage". Reuters. Archived from the original on 17 August 2022. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  36. ^ Martin Jones, David (2022). Prof. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1-80220-945-7.
  37. ^ Maochan Yu, Miles (5 May 2021). "Beijing's Woke Propaganda War in America". Hoover Institution. Archived from the original on 5 May 2024. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  38. ^ Van Fleet, Xi (2023). Mao's America. Center Street (published October 2023). ISBN 9781546006329.
  39. ^ "Report to Congress on Chinese Espionage Activities Against the United States". FBI/CIA. 12 December 1999. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
  40. ^ Cox, Christopher (1999). The Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China. Washington: U.S. G.P.O. OCLC 41428120. OL 17581519M. Archived from the original on 15 June 2020. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  41. ^ Tucker, Patrick (29 June 2022). "China's Disinformation Warriors May Be Coming for Your Company". Defense One. Archived from the original on 2 September 2023. Retrieved 2 September 2023.
  42. ^ a b "Contagious Disruption: How CCP Influence and Radical Ideologies Threaten Critical Infrastructure and Campuses Across the United States". Network Contagion Research Institute. Archived from the original on 16 May 2024. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  43. ^ Wise, David (2011). Tiger Trap: America's Secret Spy War With China. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. pp. 38, 110. ISBN 978-0-547-55310-8. OCLC 746747564.
  44. ^ "America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections?" (PDF). Government Accountability Institute. 26 September 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2012. ((cite journal)): Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  45. ^ Woodward, Bob; Brian Duffy (13 February 1997). "Chinese Embassy Role in Contributions Probed". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 18 August 2018. Retrieved 8 September 2017.
  46. ^ Woodward, Bob (25 April 1997). "FBI Links Top China Officials, U.S. Donations". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 28 March 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  47. ^ Johnston, David (12 May 1999). "Committee Told of Beijing Cash For Democrats". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 September 2017. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
  48. ^ Paul, Katie (27 September 2022). "Meta says removes China-based propaganda operation targeting U.S. midterms". Reuters. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
  49. ^ Myers, Steven Lee (27 September 2022). "Meta Removes Chinese Effort to Influence U.S. Elections". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
  50. ^ Hsu, Tiffany; Myers, Steven Lee (1 April 2024). "China's Advancing Efforts to Influence the U.S. Election Raise Alarms". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 April 2024. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
  51. ^ Langley, William; White, Edward (14 March 2022). "China backs Russian allegations about US biological weapons". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 25 March 2022.
  52. ^ McCarthy, Simone (10 March 2022). "China's promotion of Russian disinformation indicates where its loyalties lie". CNN. Archived from the original on 12 May 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  53. ^ Goodwin, Bill (23 March 2022). "Chinese state media use Facebook to push pro-Russia disinformation on Ukraine war". Computer Weekly. Archived from the original on 24 March 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  54. ^ Young, Oliver (11 March 2022). "Chinese State Media Reinforces Russian Disinformation About War in Ukraine". China Digital Times. Archived from the original on 18 March 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  55. ^ Rising, David (11 March 2022). "China amplifies unsupported Russian claim of Ukraine biolabs". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  56. ^ Mozur, Paul; Myers, Steven Lee; Liu, John (11 April 2022). "China's Echoes of Russia's Alternate Reality Intensify Around the World". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 20 May 2022. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  57. ^ Aisha, Majid (21 March 2022). "How China uses Facebook to promote disinformation about Ukraine". Press Gazette. Archived from the original on 7 November 2022. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
  58. ^ Carey, Alexis (7 April 2022). "Chinese state media's shocking claim after evidence of Russian torture revealed". Archived from the original on 7 April 2022. Retrieved 6 June 2022.
  59. ^ Bagchi, Indrani (13 August 2017). "Doklam standoff: China playing out its 'Three Warfares' strategy against India". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 15 September 2020.
  60. ^ Winger, Gregory. "China's Disinformation Campaign in the Philippines". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 9 October 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  61. ^ "Operation Naval Gazing". Graphika. Archived from the original on 14 May 2024. Retrieved 1 June 2024.
  62. ^ Conger, Kate (11 June 2020). "Twitter Removes Chinese Disinformation Campaign". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 14 June 2020. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
  63. ^ Taylor, Josh (12 June 2020). "Twitter deletes 170,000 accounts linked to China influence campaign". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 14 June 2020. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
  64. ^ "Twitter suspends 'China-backed accounts that spread propaganda'". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 13 June 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2020.
  65. ^ Strong, Matthew (7 August 2020). "Google removes 2,500 China-linked YouTube channels". Taiwan News. Archived from the original on 24 August 2020. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
  66. ^ "TAG Bulletin: Q2 2020". Google. 5 August 2020. Archived from the original on 20 May 2024. Retrieved 1 June 2024.