CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. SpencerT•C 06:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 6 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 3 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
((CSD backlogs)) 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 44 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
This username matched "hate..." on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Please only block user if the name actually refers to hatred of other people or groups of people. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Question: Does this count as a DISRUPTNAME? Nobody (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC) This username matched "autism" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC) Note on file Do be aware that some users who use this string may genuinely be autistic - please be careful and make sure you are dealing with a vandal/LTA first -- DQB (owner / report) 17:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC) This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: 40chars. Violating string: winter solstice bullet phor my valentije" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Note on file Username exceeds 40 characters. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC) This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: To match Draft:Ramgarh Hill which was creation-protected last year. Repeated target of sockpuppetry by Iptesh Kumar Meher (talk · contribs). Belbury (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Note: While this draft was created by said now blocked user, it was created before the block, so it isn't a G5 deletion (which would have been my way of dealing with it, and fully protect after the deletion); but we shouldn't be fully protecting a draft which has just been declined, but not rejected outright. Lectonar (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There was a recent incidence of vandalism just a few days after I published this article. It's similar to Incel and I'm expecting a lot of vandalism/disruptive editing to come up here – I think pending changes protection or semi-protection would be helpful. TLA (talk) 00:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Resumption of edit-warring after the expiration of previous page protection. Khirurg (talk) 00:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Question: Has the dispute been settled or is protection to stop edit warring still needed? Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism picked right back up after protection lapse. Nswix (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism ~ JASWE (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism ~ JASWE (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism ~ JASWE (talk) 03:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism from unconfirmed signing. The Kip 05:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
((Edit protected)), ((Edit template-protected)), ((Edit extended-protected)), or ((Edit semi-protected)) to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.((Edit COI)) template should be used.
In the "Sexual and gender-based violence' subsection under Allegations of War Crimes, the first paragraph ends with the sentence The New York Times reported that "videos of naked and bloodied women filmed by Hamas on the day of the attack, and photographs of bodies taken at the sites afterwards, suggest that women were sexually targeted by their attackers."
(Reference #615 and 616)
Two paragraphs down, the second sentence is The BBC reported that "Videos of naked and bloodied women filmed by Hamas on the day of the attack, and photographs of bodies taken at the sites afterwards, suggest that women were sexually targeted by their attackers."
(Reference 621)
Please add reference 621 to the first paragraph, and add 'and the BBC' following The New York Times, and remove the whole sentence in the third paragraph.
Awshort (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Bbb23: I feel a small bit silly leaving a talk page message here, but your talk page is indefinitely semiprotected and I'm not seeing any other reasonable way to reach you. If I can ask, why did you revert my AfD comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charmaine Yee? I know it didn't contain an explicit Keep or Delete vote—I haven't looked for external sources yet—but it did contain some thoughts on the sources currently in the article, and a warning in case anyone else doesn't realize The Straits Times isn't independent like I didn't at first. (I suppose I can make it an explicit Weak Delete At The Immediate Moment vote if that truly was the problem with it.) 2603:8001:4542:28FB:106F:4494:915:3A2A (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC) (Send talk messages here)
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC) |
| 2 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Link to previous denied request: Special:Permalink/1157787269#User:BhamBoi, and a ping to @Schwede66. Please use sigma to view my created articles, as xtools does not filter out redirects.
I've created 62 articles, and I'd like to receive the autopatrolled right because I've addressed all the concerns from my previous request—namely, my last 3 articles (Shang-Ping Xie, Highly Cited Researchers program, and Jeffrey B. Remmel) received no human edits after publication and patrol, showing my competency in writing articles that don't need another set of eyes on them before patrol.
Thanks! 
BhamBoi (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Been contributing on and off for 10 years, created a few dozen articles and DYK entries. hinnk (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request autopatrolled rights since I believe I qualify for them and I also believe they could be useful in the future creation of new pages. If another user's testimony is needed, User:Mccapra usually reviews the pages I create and was also kind enough to suggest this request. Thank you in advance. AlejandroFC (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
I have created over 200 articles. I started by first putting drafts through AfC until I felt comfortable moving them to mainspace myself. I am an AfC reviewer. I have contributed to a significant number of AfDs with a decent track record of !votes matching community consensus. TipsyElephant (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Here's the first article I've created this month: The Blind Contessa's New Machine. I noticed some other editors were declined because they haven't worked much with BLPs. Looks like the last BLP I created was Nicholas Quah. I review BLPs at AfC regularly as well. However, I would completely understand if my request was declined on those grounds because I don't create BLP articles very frequently. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello everybody. I'm actually a more active editor on ptwiki, since 2015, but I've also been editing on enwiki. I have already created 27 articles. My counter has 25 articles, but I also created Bubble Bobble 4 Friends and Yu-Gi-Oh! GX Tag Force 2, which unfortunately didn't enter my counter. I also participated in the promotion for GA of the Valis III article. I will soon promote Lupe Cotrim. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 01:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Bubble Bobble 4 Friends was just a redirect. I tried to ask for the redirect to be speedy deleted, and thus to count count as my creation. But unfortunately the administrator refused my request. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 12:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Has created 50 articles over the past year, the vast majority (all?) well-referenced and with no outstanding maintenance tags. This relitigation of a minor 2021 dispute is the only controversy she's been involved in over that timeframe. I notice that she has put in a few inappropriate external links to YouTube, but if those were too minor for previous patrollers to change, they're probably too minor to hold up this user right. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I wish to get the Autopatrolled rights to assess impending modifications of my edits automatically. I am aware of and have read the pertinent guidelines for this authorization. You can check my userpage to see a good summary of my contributions on Wikipedia. TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 06:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that my page mover rights were revoked due to my inactivity. Now that I'm back, I would like to request to have this user right reinstated so I can continue using the tool to move pages when necessary. Thank you. GSS 💬 13:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done You've been gone 2 years and only resumed editing a couple days ago. I'd like to see you spend a few weeks re-familiarizing yourself with Wikipedia before assigning you advanced permissions -Fastily 10:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
I've reverted vandalism and have a clean record of constructive edits to pages in article space. Having this responsibility would allow me to better help the site. ''Flux55'' (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Hey man im josh (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission pending changes reviewer. — MusikBot talk 16:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Avid RC patroller looking to help Wikipedia's quality assurance in a more diverse way. Synorem (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I have been regularly creating articles and patrolling recent changes over the last month. I would like to start helping out with pending changes. I think I have a good grasp of what would and would not be acceptable under the pending changes policy. MaterialsPsych (talk) 10:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Done The Night Watch (talk) 23:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Hi, I'm requesting the responsibility to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I believe I have a significant history of addressing vandals on various pages, as recent history is typically one of the first things I look at anyway when editing a given page. I believe I have the experience and maturity necessary to exercise this right, hopefully beyond the six criteria provided at WP:RPC. I will only use this tool to enhance my contributions to the betterment of the encyclopedia. This is my first request for permissions. Thank you for your consideration. TNstingray (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
I have used Twinkle to revert vandalism mostly from the recent changes page for quite a while now and warn/report users. Twinkle is not sufficient for me on "longer" articles because of my slow internet connection. Reverts I make with Twinkle often take up to ten seconds, which slows me down. Rollback permissions would be greatly appreciated to make edits faster and save time. I can be trusted with rollback permissions as I have been actively reverting vandalism since July 2023, consistantly warning editors with the templates that Twinkle offers with little breaks. I have a satisfactory understanding of what is and what is not vandalism. Additonally, pages on my watchlist get vandalized a lot too, so I could always help revert edits as I have a sharp eye on it. As a side note, I applied recently but got denied. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 00:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done I sampled a small handful recent reverts and found numerous instances where you are reverting edits that are either not vandalism or should not have never been reverted (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Please familiarize yourself with what actually constitutes vandalism and spend at least another month patrolling RecentChanges before reapplying. -Fastily 04:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I reverted 1700+ vandalism edits, I consistently ensure I warn the user after reverting. Getting rollback rights would significantly enhance my efficiency of reverting such vandalism edits. Alon Alush (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 15:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. I'm concerned by the recent messages on your talk page about bad reverts (i.e. 1, 2) and inappropriate use of a 4im warning. Also, I see you're still not consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Please slow down and exercise more caution, RC patrol isn't a race. I'd like to see you spend at least a month gaining more experience before making a new request. -Fastily 21:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)I have been using twinkle for a while now and have gotten familiar with it. Having rollbacks would be useful. SKAG123 (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I've been patrolling recent changes off-and-on for some time (my first Twinkle edit is from 2013!), albeit with some long wiki-breaks in-between. In the past few months I've started to get back into fighting vandalism in earnest, and I believe I've gained a very good understanding of when something is vandalism or not. I've started using Huggle in read-only mode as a real-time recent changes tool, and I'd love to be able to use the full features of this tool to fight vandalism more effectively. Thank you for considering my request! Greatpopcorn (talk) 08:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & RedWarn can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 21:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Hello there, I often find myself in articles related to Germany and it's mainly a case of vandalism that brings me here. The user has been banned, but I would like to undo his countless edits. If it is possible, the rights could only be released to me for a limited time, that would be enough. --Bildersindtoll (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & RedWarn can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 21:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)I've been reverting vandalism with Twinkle, RedWarn, and most recently Ultraviolet for a while. UV's pseudo-rollback works, but it would be helpful to have the "real" rollback because it is faster. Luke10.27 (talk) 01:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Done The Night Watch (talk) 04:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)I’d like to have rollback rights to make it easier when dealing with vandalism. As my time on Wikipedia increases, the more vandals i’ve come across. This feature would be helpful to me. Thank you. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Policies and links
