|5th through 11th centuries|
|Languages||Anglo-Frisian (Old English and Old Frisian)|
|This article is part of the series:|
society and culture
|Power and organization|
Anglo-Saxon runes (Old English: rūna ᚱᚢᚾᚪ) are runes used by the early Anglo-Saxons as an alphabet in their writing system. The characters are known collectively as the futhorc (ᚠᚢᚦᚩᚱᚳ fuþorc) from the Old English sound values of the first six runes. The futhorc was a development from the 24-character Elder Futhark. Since the futhorc runes are thought to have first been used in Frisia before the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain, they have also been called Anglo-Frisian runes. They were likely to have been used from the 5th century onward, recording Old English and Old Frisian.
They were gradually supplanted in Anglo-Saxon England by the Old English Latin alphabet introduced by missionaries. Futhorc runes were no longer in common use by the eleventh century, but The Byrhtferth Manuscript (MS Oxford St John's College 17) indicates that fairly accurate understanding of them persisted into at least the twelfth century.
|Part of a series on|
There are competing theories about the origins of the Anglo-Saxon futhorc. One theory proposes that it was developed in Frisia and from there later spread to Britain. Another holds that runes were first introduced to Britain from the mainland where they were then modified and exported to Frisia. Both theories have their inherent weaknesses, and a definitive answer may come from further archaeological evidence.
The early futhorc was nearly identical to the Elder Futhark, except for the split of ᚨ a into three variants ᚪ āc, ᚫ æsc and ᚩ ōs, resulting in 26 runes. This was done to account for the new phoneme produced by the Ingvaeonic split of allophones of long and short a. The earliest known instance of the ᚩ ōs rune may be from the 5th-century, on the Undley bracteate. The earliest known instances of the ᚪ āc rune may be from the 6th century, appearing on objects such as the Schweindorf solidus. The double-barred ᚻ hægl characteristic of continental inscriptions is first attested as late as 698, on St Cuthbert's coffin; before that, the single-barred variant was used.
In England, outside of the Brittonic Westcountry where evidence of Latin and even Ogham continued for several centuries, usage of the futhorc expanded. Runic writing in England became closely associated with the Latin scriptoria from the time of Anglo-Saxon Christianization in the 7th century. In some cases, texts would be written in the Latin alphabet, and þorn and ƿynn came to be used as extensions of the Latin alphabet. By the time of the Norman Conquest of 1066 it was very rare, and it disappeared altogether a few centuries thereafter. From at least five centuries of use, fewer than 200 artefacts bearing futhorc inscriptions have survived.
Several famous English examples mix runes and Roman script, or Old English and Latin, on the same object, including the Franks Casket and St Cuthbert's coffin; in the latter, three of the names of the Four Evangelists are given in Latin written in runes, but "LUKAS" (Saint Luke) is in Roman script. The coffin is also an example of an object created at the heart of the Anglo-Saxon church that uses runes. A leading expert, Raymond Ian Page, rejects the assumption often made in non-scholarly literature that runes were especially associated in post-conversion Anglo-Saxon England with Anglo-Saxon paganism or magic.
The letter sequence and letter inventory of futhorc, along with the actual sounds indicated by those letters, could vary depending on location and time. That being so, an authentic and unified list of runes is not possible.
The names of the runes below are based on Codex Vindobonensis 795, besides the names ing and æsc which come from The Byrhtferth's Manuscript and replace the seemingly corrupted names lug and æs found in Codex Vindobonensis 795.
The spellings in parentheses in the name column are standardized archeological spellings for the Old English words, alongside the ones used contemporarily. The transliteration is based on Latin alphabet documents of Old English writing.
The sequence of the runes here is based on Codex Vindobonensis 795:
|ᚠ||Feh (Feoh)||wealth, cattle||f||/f/, [v] (allophone of /f/)|
|ᚢ||Ur (Úr)||aurochs||u (u, ú)||/u(ː)/|
|ᚦ||Ðorn (Þorn/ Thorn)||thorn||þ/ ð (th)||/θ/, [ð] (allophone of /θ/)|
|ᚩ||Os (Ós)||heathen god (mouth in rune poem?)||o (o, ó)||/o(ː)/)|
|ᚳ||Cen (Ċén)||torch||c (c, ċ)||/k/; /tʃ/|
|ᚷ||Geofu (Ġiefu)||gift||g (g, ġ)||/ɣ/, [g] (allophone of /ɣ/);
/ʝ/, [d͡ʒ] (allophone of /ʝ/)
|ᚻ||Hægil (Hæġl)||hail||h||/h/; [x], [ç]|
|ᛁ||Is (Ís)||ice||i (i, í)||/i(ː)/|
|ᛡ/ᛄ||Gær (Jéar)||year||j (i, ġ)||/j/|
|ᛇ||Ih (Íw)||yew tree||ï (í); h||/i(ː)/; [x], [ç]|
|ᛉ||Ilcs (Eolhs?)||(unknown, perhaps a derivative of elk)||x||rare for /ks/, but still used to transliterate the Latin letter 'X' into runes|
|ᛋ/ᚴ||Sygil (Siġl)||sun (sail in rune poem?)||s||/s/, [z] (allophone of /s/)|
|ᛏ||Ti (Tíw)||(unknown, originally god, Planet Mars in rune poem?)||t||/t/|
|ᛒ||Berc (Beorċ)||birch tree||b||/b/|
|ᛖ||Eh (Eoh)||steed||e (e, é)||/e(ː)/|
|ᛚ||Lagu||body of water (lake)||l||/l/|
|ᛝ||Ing||Ing (Ingui-Frea?)||ŋ (ng)||/ŋ(g)/|
|ᛟ||Ødil (ǿþel)||inherited land, home country||ø (ø, ǿ)||/ø(ː)/|
|ᚪ||Ac (Ác)||oak tree||a (a, á)||/ɑ(ː)/|
|ᚫ||Æsc (Æsċ)||ash tree||æ (æ, ǽ)||/æ(ː)/|
|ᛠ||Ear (Éar)||(unknown, perhaps earth)||ea (ea, éa)||/æ(ː)ɑ/|
|ᚣ||Yr (Ýr)||(unknown, perhaps bow)||y (y, ý)||/y(ː)/|
The first 24 of these runes directly continue the elder futhark letters, and do not deviate in sequence (though ᛞ-ᛟ rather than ᛟ-ᛞ is an attested sequence in both elder futhark and futhorc). The manuscripts Codex Sangallensis 878 and Cotton MS Domitian A IX have ᚣ precede ᛠ. Also note is that ti is sometimes named tir or tyr in other manuscripts.
Diacritic marks over letters are modern additions, used to distinguish multiple sounds written the same way. Macrons and acute accents over vowels are interchangeable in the context of old English. Some letters (<j> <ŋ>, <ï>, <ę> <ᴇ>, <ḡ>, <į>, <k>, <k̄>, and <q>) only are used when transliterating Old English runes, and were never (fully) part of its Latin alphabet. There are also some Old English phonemes and spellings that were different across dialects, or exclusive to specific ones. For more information, see Old English phonology and Old English orthography, which focusses on Latin alphabet texts and the language more broadly.
The runes in this section were not included in Codex Vindobonensis 795, and their use and phonemic value is uncertain.
|N/A||(unknown)||(unknown)||ę, ᴇ (e)||/ǝ/?|
|ᚸ||Gar (Gár)||spear||ḡ (g)||/ɣ/, [g] (allophone of /ɣ/)|
|ᛣ||Calc||chalk? chalice? sandal?||k (c)||/k/|
|ᛢ||Qeorð (Cweorþ)||(unknown)||q (c, q)||/k/? (for writing Latin?)|
What is known about these various runes is listed below:
Various runic combinations are found in the futhorc corpus. For example, the sequence ᚫᚪ appears on the Mortain Casket where ᛠ could theoretically have been used.
|Combination||Letter||Sound (IPA)||Corpus word||Meaning||Found on|
|ᚩᛁ||Ós (o)||Ís (i)||/oj/?||]oin[.]||(unknown)||Lindisfarne Stone II|
|ᚷᚳ||Ġiefu (g)||Ċén (c)||[gg]?, [ddʒ]?||Blagcmon||(personal name)||Maughold Stone I|
|ᚷᚷ||Ġiefu (g)||Ġiefu (g)||[gg]? [ddʒ]?||Eggbrect||(personal name)||(an armband from the Galloway Hoard)|
|ᚻᚹ||Hæġl (h)||Wynn (w)||/ʍ/||gehwelc||each||Honington Clip|
|ᚻᛋ||Hæġl (h)||Siġl (s)||/ks/, /xs/||wohs (weax)||to wax||Brandon Antler|
|ᚾᚷ||Níed (n)||Ġiefu (g)||/ŋg/||hring||ring||Wheatley Hill Silver-Gilt Finger-Ring|
|ᛁᚷ||Ís (i)||Ġiefu (g)||/iʝ/||modig (módiġ)||proud/bold/arrogant||Ruthwell Cross|
|ᛇᛡ?||Íw (ï/ h)||Jéar (j)||/ij/?||hælïj?||holy?||Gandersheim Casket|
|ᛇᛋ||Íw (ï/ h)||Siġl (s)||/ks/||Be(o)nna-Reïs||king Be(o)nna||(a coin of Beonna of East Anglia)|
|ᛋᚳ||siġl (s)||Ċén (c)||/sk/, /ʃ/||fisc||fish||Franks Casket|
|ᛖᚩ||Eoh (e)||Ós (o)||/eo/, /eːo/||Eoh||(personal name)||Kirkheaton Stone|
|ᛖᚷ||Eoh (e)||Ġiefu (g)||/eʝ/||legdun (leġdon)||laid||Ruthwell Cross|
|ᛖᛇ||Eoh (e)||Íw (ï/ h)||/ej/?, /eʝ/?||Eateïnne||(personal name)||Thornhill Stone II|
|ᛖᚪ||Eoh (e)||Ác (a)||/æɑ/, /æːɑ/||Eadbald (Éadbald)||(personal name)||Santi Marcellino e Pietro al Laterano Graffiti|
|ᚪᚢ||Ác (a)||Úr (u)||/ɑw/?||saule (sáwle)||soul||Thornhill Stone III|
|ᚪᛁ||Ác (a)||Ís (i)||/ɑj/||Aib||(personal name)||Oostum Comb|
|ᚪᛡ||Ác (a)||Jéar (j)||/ɑj/?, /ɑʝ/?||Fajhild?||(personal name)||Santi Marcellino e Pietro ad Duas Lauros Graffiti|
|ᚫᚢ||Æsċ (æ)||Úr (u)||/æw/?||dæus||deus (Latin)||Whitby Comb|
|ᚫᚪ||Æsċ (æ)||Ác (a)||/æɑ/, /æːɑ/||Æadan||(personal name)||Mortain Casket|
A rune in Old English could be called a rūnstæf (perhaps meaning something along the lines of "mystery letter" or "whisper letter"), or simply rūn.
Futhorc inscriptions hold diverse styles and contents. Ochre has been detected on at least one English runestone, implying its runes were once painted. Bind runes are common in futhorc (relative to its small corpus), and were seemingly used most often to ensure the runes would fit in a limited space. Futhorc logography is attested to in a few manuscripts. This was done by having a rune stand for its name, or a similar sounding word. In the sole extant manuscript of the poem Beowulf, the ēðel rune was used as a logogram for the word ēðel (meaning "homeland", or "estate"). Both the Hackness Stone and Codex Vindobonensis 795 attest to futhorc Cipher runes. In one manuscript (Corpus Christi College, MS 041) a writer seems to have used futhorc runes like Roman numerals, writing ᛉᛁᛁ⁊ᛉᛉᛉᛋᚹᛁᚦᚩᚱ, which likely means "12&30 more".
There is some evidence of futhorc rune magic. The possibly magical alu sequence seems to appear on an urn found at Spong Hill in spiegelrunes (runes whose shapes are mirrored). In a tale from Bede's Ecclesiastical History (written in Latin), a man named Imma cannot be bound by his captors and is asked if he is using "litteras solutorias" (loosening letters) to break his binds. In one Old English translation of the passage, Imma is asked if he is using "drycraft" (magic, druidcraft) or "runestaves" to break his binds. Furthermore, futhorc rings have been found with what appear to be enchanted inscriptions for the stanching of blood.
The Old English and Old Frisian Runic Inscriptions database project at the Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany aims at collecting the genuine corpus of Old English inscriptions containing more than two runes in its paper edition, while the electronic edition aims at including both genuine and doubtful inscriptions down to single-rune inscriptions.
The corpus of the paper edition encompasses about one hundred objects (including stone slabs, stone crosses, bones, rings, brooches, weapons, urns, a writing tablet, tweezers, a sun-dial,[clarification needed] comb, bracteates, caskets, a font, dishes, and graffiti). The database includes, in addition, 16 inscriptions containing a single rune, several runic coins, and 8 cases of dubious runic characters (runelike signs, possible Latin characters, weathered characters). Comprising fewer than 200 inscriptions, the corpus is slightly larger than that of Continental Elder Futhark (about 80 inscriptions, c. 400–700), but slightly smaller than that of the Scandinavian Elder Futhark (about 260 inscriptions, c. 200–800).
Runic finds in England cluster along the east coast with a few finds scattered further inland in Southern England. Frisian finds cluster in West Frisia. Looijenga (1997) lists 23 English (including two 7th-century Christian inscriptions) and 21 Frisian inscriptions predating the 9th century.
Currently known inscriptions in Anglo-Frisian runes include:
|* Ferwerd combcase, 6th century; me uræ|
|* Amay comb, c. 600; eda|
|* Oostyn comb, 8th century; aib ka[m]bu / deda habuku (with a triple-barred h)|
|* Toornwerd comb, 8th century; kabu|
|* Skanomody solidus, 575–610; skanomodu|
|* Harlingen solidus, 575–625, hada (two ac runes, double-barred h)|
|* Schweindorf solidus, 575–625, wela[n]du "Weyland" (or þeladu; running right to left)|
|* Folkestone tremissis, c. 650; æniwulufu|
|* Midlum sceat, c. 750; æpa|
|* Rasquert swordhandle (whalebone handle of a symbolic sword), late 8th century; ek [u]mædit oka, "I, Oka, not made mad" (compare ek unwodz from the Danish corpus)|
|* Arum sword, a yew-wood miniature sword, late 8th century; edæboda|
|* Westeremden A, a yew weaving-slay; adujislume[þ]jisuhidu|
|* Westeremden B, a yew-stick, 8th century; oph?nmuji?adaamluþ / :wimœ?ahþu?? / iwio?u?du?ale|
|* Britsum yew-stick; þkniaberetdud / ]n:bsrsdnu; the k has Younger Futhark shape and probably represents a vowel.|
|* Hantum whalebone plate; [.]:aha:k[; the reverse side is inscribed with Roman ABA.|
|* Bernsterburen whalebone staff, c. 800; tuda æwudu kius þu tuda|
|* Hamwic horse knucklebone, dated to between 650 and 1025; katæ (categorised as Frisian on linguistic grounds, from *kautōn "knucklebone")|
|* Wijnaldum B gold pendant, c. 600; hiwi|
|* Kantens combcase, early 5th century; li|
|* Hoogebeintum comb, c. 700; [...]nlu / ded|
|* Wijnaldum A antler piece; zwfuwizw[...]|
|* Ash Gilton (Kent) gilt silver sword pommel, 6th century; [...]emsigimer[...]|
|* Chessel Down I (Isle of Wight), 6th century; [...]bwseeekkkaaa|
|* Chessel Down II (Isle of Wight) silver plate (attached to the scabbard mouthpiece of a ring-sword), early 6th century; æko:[.]ori|
|* Boarley (Kent) copper disc-brooch, c. 600; ærsil|
|* Harford (Norfolk) brooch, c. 650; luda:gibœtæsigilæ "Luda repaired the brooch"|
|* West Heslerton (North Yorkshire) copper cruciform brooch, early 6th century; neim|
|* Loveden Hill (Lincolnshire) urn; 5th to 6th century; reading uncertain, maybe sïþæbæd þiuw hlaw "the grave of Siþæbæd the maid"|
|* Spong Hill (Norfolk), three cremation urns, 5th century; decorated with identical runic stamps, reading alu (in Spiegelrunen).|
|* Kent II coins (some 30 items), 7th century; reading pada|
|* Kent III, IV silver sceattas, c. 600; reading æpa and epa|
|* Suffolk gold shillings (three items), c. 660; stamped with desaiona|
|* Caistor-by-Norwich astragalus, 5th century; possibly a Scandinavian import, in Elder Futhark transliteration reading raïhan "roe"|
|* Watchfield (Oxfordshire) copper fittings, 6th century; Elder Futhark reading hariboki:wusa (with a probably already fronted to æ)|
|* Wakerley (Northamptonshire) copper brooch, 6th century; buhui|
|* Dover (Kent) brooch, c. 600; þd bli / bkk|
|* Upper Thames Valley gold coins (four items), 620s; benu:tigoii; benu:+:tidi|
|* Willoughby-on-the-Wolds (Nottinghamshire) copper bowl, c. 600; a|
|* Cleatham (South Humbershire) copper bowl, c. 600; [...]edih|
|* Sandwich/Richborough (Kent) stone, 650 or earlier; [...]ahabu[...]i, perhaps *ræhæbul "stag"|
|* Whitby I (Yorkshire) jet spindle whorl; ueu|
|* Selsey (West Sussex) gold plates, 6th to 8th centuries; brnrn / anmu|
|* St. Cuthbert's coffin (Durham), dated to 698|
|* Whitby II (Yorkshire) bone comb, 7th century;
[dæ]us mæus godaluwalu dohelipæ cy[ i.e. deus meus, god aluwaldo, helpæ Cy... "my god, almighty god, help Cy..." (Cynewulf or a similar personal name; compare also names of God in Old English poetry.)
|* the Franks casket; 7th century|
|* zoomorphic silver-gilt knife mount, discovered in the River Thames near Westminster Bridge (late 8th century)|
|* the Ruthwell Cross; 8th century, the inscription may be partly a modern reconstruction|
|* the Brandon antler piece, wohs wildum deoræ an "[this] grew on a wild animal"; 9th century.|
|* Kingmoor Ring|
|* the Seax of Beagnoth; 9th century (also known as the Thames scramasax); the only complete alphabet|
|* Near Fakenham plaque; 8th-11th century lead plaque interpreted as bearing a healing inscription |
((citation)): CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).