This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Classical Chinese" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Classical Chinese
Literary Chinese
古文 or 文言
RegionThe Sinosphere:
Era
  • Originally written c. 5th century BCE – c. 2nd century CE
  • Used widely as a literary language until the 20th century
Sino-Tibetan
Chinese characters
Language codes
ISO 639-3lzh
Glottologlite1248
Linguasphere79-AAA-aa
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.
Classical Chinese
Chinese name
Chinese文言文
Literal meaningliterary language writing
Vietnamese name
Vietnamese alphabet
  • Hán văn
  • cổ văn
  • văn ngôn
Chữ Hán
  • 漢文
  • 古文
  • 文言
Korean name
Hangul한문
Hanja漢文
Japanese name
Kanji漢文
Hiraganaかんぶん

Classical Chinese[a] is the language in which the classics of Chinese literature were written, starting c. the 5th century BCE.[2] For millennia thereafter, the written Chinese used in these works was imitated and iterated upon by scholars in the Sinosphere in a form now called Literary Chinese, which was used for almost all formal writing in China until the early 20th century. Its use is roughly comparable to that of Latin across post-Roman Europe. While not static throughout its history, its evolution has traditionally been guided by a conservative impulse: many changes found in the varieties of Chinese that later emerged are not reflected in the literary form. Due to millennia of this linguistic evolution, Literary Chinese is only partially intelligible when spoken aloud or read for an individual only familiar with modern vernacular Chinese.

Over time, Literary Chinese began to be used in Japan, Ryukyu, Korea, and Vietnam, where it was originally introduced as the prestige form of the only known writing system, before eventually being adapted to write the local languages, which belonged to completely different language families. Each of these countries have their own reading systems for Classical Chinese text, in addition to their own inventories of Chinese character forms.

Classical Chinese has largely been replaced by written vernacular Chinese among Chinese speakers; similarly, speakers of non-Chinese languages have largely abandoned Classical Chinese in favor of their respective local vernaculars. Although varieties of Chinese have diverged in various directions from the Old Chinese words in the Classical lexicon, many cognates can be still be found.

Nomenclature

Pages of a copy of the 詩經; Shījīng; "Classic of Poetry"
The Classic of Poetry, a literary collection of 305 works dating from the 11th to 7th centuries BCE, written in what is generally termed "pre-Classical Chinese"

There is no universal agreement on the precise definition of "Classical Chinese". At its core, the term refers to the language found in the classics of Chinese literature written from around the 5th century BCE to the end of the Han dynasty in the 3rd century CE. It has been noted that the form of Chinese used in canonical works written before the 4th century BCE, such as the Five Classics, is distinct from that found in later works. Moreover, this older form did not foster comparable imitative traditions, despite the equivalent canonicity of the works. The term "pre-Classical Chinese" has thus been assigned to this earlier form of the language, and it is generally considered to be distinct from "Classical Chinese" proper.[3]

After the end of the Han dynasty, the divergence of ordinary spoken language from the literary form became highly apparent. The term "Literary Chinese" has thus been coined to refer to the forms of written Chinese in conscious imitation of the earlier Classical canon, characterized by the addition of new vocabulary over the centuries, as well as the erosion of certain points of Classical grammar and syntax as their precise functions were forgotten. As such, Literary Chinese was used for almost all formal writing in China from the end of the Han dynasty to the early 20th century, when it was replaced en masse by written vernacular Chinese. A distinct, narrower definition of the Classical period ranges from the time of Confucius (551–479 BCE) to the founding of the Qin dynasty in 221 BCE.[4][5]

Often, Literary Chinese is additionally referred to as "Classical Chinese", but sinologists generally emphasize the distinctions between the form used during the Classical period and imitative forms that followed. After the 2nd century CE, the Chinese language as spoken in various areas began to diverge, and thus written Literary Chinese became less and less representative of the varieties of Chinese spoken and understood by ordinary people. Although authors sought to write in the style of the classics, the likeness decreased over the centuries due to an imperfect understanding of older language conventions, as well as the addition of new vocabulary and influence from the writer's own spoken form of the language.[6]

The use of Literary Chinese throughout the Sinosphere despite the existence of numerous regional vernaculars is an example of diglossia. The coexistence of Literary Chinese and native languages throughout China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam can be compared to the historical literary use of Latin in Europe, that of Arabic in Persia, or that of Sanskrit in South and Southeast Asia. However, unlike these examples, written Chinese uses a logography of Chinese characters that are not directly tied to their pronunciation. This lack of a fixed correspondence between writing and reading created a situation where later readings of classical Chinese texts were able to diverge much further from their originals than occurred in the other literary traditions, adding a unique dimension to the study of Literary Chinese.

Unlike Latin and Sanskrit, historical Chinese language theory consisted almost exclusively of lexicography, as opposed to the study of grammar and syntax. Such approaches largely arrived with Europeans beginning in the 17th century. Christian missionaries later coined the term 文理 (wénlǐ; 'principles of literature', 'bookish language') to describe Classical Chinese; this term never became widely used among domestic speakers.[7][8]

Grammar and lexicon

Main article: Classical Chinese grammar

Classical Chinese is distinguished from written vernacular Chinese in its style, which appears extremely concise and compact to modern Chinese speakers, and to some extent in the use of different vocabulary. Classical Chinese rarely uses words of two or more characters. This stands directly in contrast with modern northern Chinese varieties including Mandarin, in which words two to four characters in length are extremely common. Disyllabic words are also common within southern varieties, but distinctly less so than in northern varieties. Over time, varieties acquired many polysyllabic words in order to disambiguate monosyllabic words with distinct pronunciations that had since converged in a given locale, becoming homophones. An essay written in Classical Chinese might be half the length of one in vernacular Chinese that relates the same ideas, but may use a much larger number of distinct characters.

Classical Chinese can be described as a pro-drop language: its syntax often allows either subjects or objects to be dropped when their reference is understood. Additionally, words are generally not restricted to use as certain parts of speech: many characters may function as either a noun, verb, or adjective. There is no copula in Classical Chinese: (shì) serves this function in modern Standard Chinese, but in Old Chinese it was a near demonstrative ('this').

Classical Chinese has more pronouns compared to the modern vernacular. In particular, whereas modern Standard Chinese has one character generally used as a first-person pronoun, Classical Chinese has several—many of which are used as part of a system of honorifics. Many final[b] and interrogative particles are found in Classical Chinese.[9]

Beyond differences in grammar and vocabulary, Classical Chinese can be distinguished by its literary qualities: an effort to maintain parallelism and rhythm is typical, even in prose works. Works also make extensive use of literary techniques such as allusion, which contributes to the language's brevity.

Historical use

Main article: Adoption of Chinese literary culture

Literary Chinese was adopted in Korea, Japan, and Vietnam. The Oxford Handbook of Classical Chinese Literature argues that this adoption came mainly from diplomatic and cultural ties with China, while conquest, colonization, and migration played smaller roles.[10]

Transmission of texts

According to tradition, in 213 BCE Qin Shi Huang ordered both the historical records of all non-Qin states, as well as any literature associated with the Hundred Schools of Thought, to be burnt. The imperial library was destroyed shortly thereafter upon the dynasty's collapse in 206 BCE, resulting in a potentially even greater loss. Even those works from the Classical period that have survived catastrophes of this kind are not known to exist in their original forms; they are attested only in manuscripts copied centuries after their original authorship. The "Yiwenzhi" section of the Book of Han is the oldest extant bibliography of Classical Chinese, compiled c. 90 CE—of its 653 listed works, only 6% are presently known to exist in a complete form, with another 6% existing only in fragments.[11]

Modern use

A letter written in Literary Chinese sent from Kublai Khan to the "King of Japan" (日本國王) dated 1266, prior to the Mongol invasions of Japan. Grammar notes have been added to aid the understanding of Japanese speakers.

Classical Chinese was the main form used in Sinosphere literature until the 1919 May Fourth Movement. It was used to write the Hunmin Jeongeum proclamation in which the modern hangul alphabet was promulgated, and the essay by Hu Shih in which he argued against using Classical Chinese and in favor of written vernacular Chinese. Exceptions to the historical use of Classical Chinese include the vernacular novel Dream of the Red Chamber. Most government documents in the Republic of China were written in Literary Chinese until reforms spearheaded by President Yen Chia-kan in the 1970s to shift to written vernacular Chinese.[12][13] However, most of the laws of Taiwan are still written in a subset of Literary Chinese. As a result, it is necessary for modern Taiwanese lawyers to learn at least a subset of the literary language.

Many works of literature in Classical and Literary Chinese have been highly influential in Chinese culture, such as the canon of Tang poetry. However, even with knowledge of its grammar and vocabulary, works in Literary Chinese can be difficult for native vernacular speakers to understand, due to its frequent allusions and references to other historical literature, as well as the extremely laconic style. Presently, pure Literary Chinese is occasionally used in formal or ceremonial contexts. For example, the National Anthem of the Republic of China is in Literary Chinese. Buddhist texts in Literary Chinese are still preserved from the time they were composed or translated from Sanskrit. In practice there is a socially accepted continuum between vernacular and Literary Chinese. For example, most official notices and formal letters use stock literary expressions within vernacular prose.

Personal use of Classical phrases depends on factors such as the subject matter and the level of education of the writer. Excepting professional scholars and enthusiasts, most modern writers cannot easily write in Literary Chinese. Even so, most Chinese people with at least a middle school education are able to read basic Literary Chinese, because this ability is part of the Chinese middle school and high school curricula, and is a component of the college entrance examination. Literary Chinese in the school curriculum is taught primarily by presenting a literary work and including a vernacular gloss that explains the meaning of phrases. The examinations usually require the student to read a paragraph in Literary Chinese and then explain its meaning in the vernacular.

Contemporary use of Literary Chinese in Japan is mainly in the field of education and the study of literature. Learning kanbun, the Japanese readings of Literary Chinese, is part of the high school curriculum in Japan.[14] Japan is the only country that maintains the tradition of creating Classical Chinese poetry based on Tang-era tone patterns.[15][failed verification]

Phonology

Further information: Old Chinese phonology and Middle Chinese

The shape of the character 'person' in oracle bone script may have influenced the character 'harvest', which later acquired the additional meaning of 'year'[c]

Chinese characters are not phonetic and rarely reflect later sound changes in words. Efforts to reconstruct Old Chinese pronunciation began relatively recently. Classical Chinese is not read with a reconstructed Old Chinese pronunciation; instead, it is read with the pronunciations as categorized and listed in a rime dictionary originally based upon the Middle Chinese pronunciation in Luoyang during the 2nd–4th centuries. Over time, each dynasty updated and modified the official rime dictionary: by the time of the Yuan and Ming dynasties, its phonology reflected that of early Mandarin. Since the imperial examination required the candidate to compose poetry in the shi genre, pronunciation in non-Mandarin speaking parts of China such as Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian is either based on everyday speech, such as in Standard Cantonese, or is based on a special set of pronunciations borrowed from Classical Chinese, such as in Southern Min. In practice, all varieties of Chinese combine the two extremes of pronunciation: that according to a prescribed system, versus that based on everyday speech. Mandarin and Cantonese, for example, also have words that are pronounced one way in colloquial usage and another way when used in Classical Chinese or in specialized terms coming from Classical Chinese, though the system is not as extensive as that of Min or Wu.

Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese readers of Classical Chinese each use distinct systems of pronunciation specific to their own languages. Japanese speakers have readings of Chinese origin called on'yomi for many words, such as for "ginko" (銀行) or "Tokyo" (東京), but use kun'yomi when the kanji represents a native word such as the reading of in 行く (iku) or the reading of both characters in "Osaka" (大阪), as well as a system that aids Japanese speakers with a Classical word order.

Since pronunciation in modern varieties is different from Old Chinese or other historical forms such as Middle Chinese, characters that once rhymed may not any longer, or vice versa. Poetry and other rhyme-based writing thus becomes less coherent than the original reading must have been. However, some modern Chinese varieties have certain phonological characteristics that are closer to the older pronunciations than others, as shown by the preservation of certain rhyme structures.

Another particular characteristic of Literary Chinese is its present homophony. Reading Classical texts with character pronunciations from modern languages results in many homophonous characters that originally had distinct Old Chinese pronunciations, but have since merged to varying degrees. This phenomenon is far more common in Chinese languages than in English: for example, each of the following Old Chinese words originally had distinct pronunciations, but are now all pronounced [î] in Mandarin:

*ŋjajs ; 'discuss' *ŋjət ; 'powerful'
*ʔjup ; 'city' *ʔjək ; '100 million'
*ʔjəks ; 'thought' *ʔjek ; 'increase'
*ʔjik ; 'press down' *jak ; 'Go'
*ljit ; 'flee' *ljək ; 'wing'
*ljek ; 'change' *ljeks ; 'easy'
*slek ; 'lizard'.[17]

The famous early 20th-century poem Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den was written by the linguist Yuen Ren Chao to demonstrate this: it contains only words that are now pronounced shi [ʂɻ̩] with various tones in modern Standard Chinese. The poem underlines how the classical language had become impractical for modern speakers: when spoken aloud, Classical Chinese is largely incomprehensible. However, the poem is perfectly comprehensible when read, and also uses homophones that were present even in Old Chinese.

Romanizations have been devised to provide distinct spellings for Classical Chinese words, together with pronunciation rules for various modern varieties. The earliest was the Romanisation Interdialectique by French missionaries Henri Lamasse of the Paris Foreign Missions Society and Ernest Jasmin, based on Middle Chinese, followed by linguist Wang Li's Wényán luómǎzì based on Old Chinese in 1940, and then by Chao's General Chinese Romanization in 1975. However, none of these systems has seen extensive use.[18][19]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Chinese language terms include 古文; gǔwén; 'ancient text' and 文言; wényán; 'literary language', as well as 文言文; wényánwén; "literary language writing" in written vernacular Chinese. The term is read as kanbun in Japanese, hanmun in Korean, and văn ngôn[1] or Hán văn in Vietnamese.
  2. ^ 歇語字; xiēyǔzì
  3. ^ Today, they are pronounced rén and nián in Mandarin, but their hypothesized pronunciations in Old Chinese were very similar, which may explain the resemblance. For example, in the 2014 reconstruction by Baxter and Sagart, they were /niŋ/ and /nˤiŋ/ respectively, and then became /nʲin/ and /nin/ in Early Middle Chinese.[16]

References

Citations

  1. ^ Nguyễn, Tri Tài (2002). Giáo trình tiếng Hán. Tập I: Cơ sở (in Vietnamese). Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. p. 5.
  2. ^ Vogelsang 2021, pp. xvii–xix.
  3. ^ Norman 1988, pp. xi, 83.
  4. ^ Peyraube, Alain (2008). "Ancient Chinese". In Woodard, Roger (ed.). The Ancient Languages of Asia and the Americas. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521684941. The Classical period proper begins with Confucius (551―479 BC), and ends around the founding of the Qin Empire in 221 BC. The attested language of the period was probably not very different from cultured speech. The gap between the written and the spoken language began to develop in the Han dynasty (206 BC―AD 220) and increased naturally with time.
  5. ^ Pulleyblank 1995, p. 3, "The classical period proper begins with Confucius 孔子 (-551 to -479) and continues through the Warring States period to the unification and founding of the empire by Qin in -221. This was the period of the major philosophers and also of the first works of narrative history.".
  6. ^ Norman 1988, pp. 83–84, 108–109.
  7. ^ Chao, Yuen Ren (1976). Aspects of Chinese Sociolinguistics: Essays by Yuen Ren Chao. Stanford University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-8047-0909-5.
  8. ^ Jost Oliver Zetzsche (1999). The Bible in China: The History of the Union Version or the Culmination of Protestant Missionary Bible Translation in China. Monumenta Serica Institute. p. 161. ISBN 3-8050-0433-8. The term "Wenli" (文理) was "an English word derived from Chinese roots but never used by the Chinese" (Yuen 1976, 25). The original meaning is "principles of literature (or: writing)," but by the missionaries of the last century it was coined to stand for Classical Chinese. For sinologues outside the missionary circle, the term "wenli" was not acceptable ("... what the missionaries persist in calling wen li, meaning thereby the book language as opposed to the colloquial"— Giles 1881/82, 151).
  9. ^ Brandt 1936, pp. 169, 184.
  10. ^ Denecke; Nguyen (2017). Denecke, Wiebke; Li, Wai-Yee; Tian, Xiaofei (eds.). Shared Literary Heritage in the East Asian Sinographic Sphere (PDF). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199356591.013.33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-03.
  11. ^ Vogelsang 2021, p. 262.
  12. ^ Tsao, Feng-fu (2000). "The Language Planning Situation in Taiwan". In Baldauf, Richard B.; Kaplan, Robert B. (eds.). Language Planning in Nepal, Taiwan, and Sweden. Vol. 115. Multilingual Matters. pp. 75–76. ISBN 978-1-85359-483-0.
  13. ^ Cheong, Ching (2001). Will Taiwan Break Away: The Rise of Taiwanese Nationalism. World Scientific. p. 187. ISBN 978-981-02-4486-6.
  14. ^ 文部省 (1951). 第七章 国語科における漢文の学習指導. 中学校 高等学校 学習指導要領 国語科編(試案) (in Japanese). Archived from the original on 2009-12-15.
  15. ^ "五言絶句編 – 漢詩の作り方 – [学ぶ] – 関西吟詩文化協会" (in Japanese).
  16. ^ Baxter & Sagart 2014, p. 239.
  17. ^ Baxter, William H. (1992). A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 802–803. ISBN 978-3-11-012324-1.
  18. ^ Branner, David Prager (2006). "Some composite phonological systems in Chinese". In Branner, David Prager (ed.). The Chinese Rime Tables: Linguistic Philosophy and Historical-Comparative Phonology. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Vol. 271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 209–232. ISBN 978-90-272-4785-8.
  19. ^ Chen, Ping (1999). Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 173–174. ISBN 978-0-521-64572-0.

Works cited