Old Yue
Native toYue, Dong'ou, Minyue, Nanyue
RegionSouthern China
Extinctc. 1st century AD
Language codes
ISO 639-3
Map of the Chinese plain at the start of the Warring States Period in the 5th century BC.
Map of the Warring States Period, after Yue conquered Wu. Other Baiyue peoples are shown in the south.

The Old Yue language (Chinese: 古越語; pinyin: Gu Yueyu; Jyutping: Gu2 Jyut6 Jyu5; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: Kó͘-oa̍t-gí / Kó͘-oa̍t-gír / Kó͘-oa̍t-gú) is an unknown unclassified language, or groups of various languages, spoken in ancient southern China, and northern Vietnam circa 700s BCE or later. It can refer to Yue, which was spoken in the realm of Yue during the Spring and Autumn period. It can also refer to the different languages spoken by the Baiyue. Possible languages spoken by them may have been of Kra–Dai, Hmong–Mien, Austronesian, Austroasiatic and other origins.

Knowledge of Yue speech is limited to fragmentary references and possible loanwords in other languages, principally Chinese. The longest attestation is the Song of the Yue Boatman, a short song transcribed phonetically in Chinese characters in 528 BC and included, with a Chinese version, in the Garden of Stories compiled by Liu Xiang five centuries later.[1]

Native Nanyue people likely spoke Old Yue, while Han settlers and government officials spoke Old Chinese. Some suggest that the descendants of the Nanyue spoke Austroasiatic languages.[2] Others suggest a language related to the modern Zhuang people. It is plausible to say that the Yue spoke more than one language. Old Chinese in the region was likely much influenced by Yue speech (and vice versa), and many Old Yue loanwords in Chinese have been identified by modern scholars.[3]

Classification theories

There is some disagreement about the languages the Yue spoke, with candidates drawn from the non-Sinitic language families still represented in areas of southern China to this day, which includes Kra–Dai, Hmong–Mien, and Austroasiatic languages;[4] as Chinese, Kra–Dai, Hmong–Mien, and the Vietic branch of Austroasiatic have similar tone systems, syllable structure, grammatical features and lack of inflection, but these features are believed to have spread by means of diffusion across the Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area, rather than indicating common descent.[5][6]

Behr (2009) also notes that the Chǔ dialect of Old Chinese was influenced by several substrata, predominantly Kra-Dai, but also possibly Austroasiatic, Austronesian and Hmong-Mien.[11]

Kra–Dai arguments

The proto-Kra–Dai language has been hypothesized to originate in the Lower Yangtze valleys. Ancient Chinese texts refer to non-Sinitic languages spoken across this substantial region and their speakers as "Yue". Although those languages are extinct, traces of their existence could be found in unearthed inscriptional materials, ancient Chinese historical texts and non-Han substrata in various Southern Chinese dialects. Thai, one of the Tai languages and the most-spoken language in the Kra–Dai language family, has been used extensively in historical-comparative linguistics to identify the origins of language(s) spoken in the ancient region of South China. One of the very few direct records of non-Sinitic speech in pre-Qin and Han times having been preserved so far is the "Song of the Yue Boatman" (Yueren Ge 越人歌), which was transcribed phonetically in Chinese characters in 528 BC, and found in the 善说 Shanshuo chapter of the Shuoyuan 说苑 or 'Garden of Persuasions'.

Willeam Meacham (1996) reports that Chinese linguists have shown strong evidence of Tai vestiges in former Yue areas: Lin (1990) found Tai elements in some Min dialects, Zhenzhang (1990) has proposed Tai etymologies and interpretations for certain place names in the former states of Wu and Yue, and Wei (1982) found similarities in the words, combinations and rhyming scheme between the "Song of the Yue Boatman" and the Kam–Tai languages.[12]

James R. Chamberlain (2016) proposes that the Kra-Dai language family was formed as early as the 12th century BCE in the middle of the Yangtze basin, coinciding roughly with the establishment of the Chu state and the beginning of the Zhou dynasty.[13] Following the southward migrations of Kra and Hlai (Rei/Li) peoples around the 8th century BCE, the Yue (Be-Tai people) started to break away and move to the east coast in the present-day Zhejiang province, in the 6th century BCE, forming the state of Yue and conquering the state of Wu shortly thereafter.[13] According to Chamberlain, Yue people (Be-Tai) began to migrate southwards along the east coast of China to what are now Guangxi, Guizhou and northern Vietnam, after Yue was conquered by Chu around 333 BCE. There the Yue (Be-Tai) formed the polities Xi Ou, which became the Northern Tai and the Luo Yue, which became the Central-Southwestern Tai.[13] However, Pittayaporn (2014), after examining layers of Chinese loanwords in proto-Southwestern Tai and other historical evidence, proposes that the southwestward migration of southwestern Tai-speaking tribes from the modern Guangxi to the mainland of Southeast Asia must have taken place only sometime between the 8th–10th centuries CE,[14] long after 44 CE, when Chinese sources last mentioned Luo Yue in the Red River Delta.[15]

Ancient textual evidence

In the early 1980s, Zhuang linguist, Wei Qingwen (韦庆稳), electrified the scholarly community in Guangxi by identifying the language in the "Song of the Yue Boatman" as a language ancestral to Zhuang.[19] Wei used reconstructed Old Chinese for the characters and discovered that the resulting vocabulary showed strong resemblance to modern Zhuang.[20] Later, Zhengzhang Shangfang (1991) followed Wei’s insight but used Thai script for comparison, since this orthography dates from the 13th century and preserves archaisms relative to the modern pronunciation.[20][1] Zhengzhang notes that 'evening, night, dark' bears the C tone in Wuming Zhuang xamC2 and ɣamC2 'night'. The item raa normally means 'we inclusive' but in some places, e.g. Tai Lue and White Tai 'I'.[21] However, Laurent criticizes Zhengzhang's interpretation as anachronistic, because however archaic that Thai script is, Thai language was only written 2000 years after the song had been recorded; even if the Proto-Kam-Tai might have emerged by 6th century BCE, its pronunciation would have been substantially different from Thai.[7] The following is a simplified interpretation of the "Song of the Yue Boatman" by Zhengzhang Shangfang quoted by David Holm (2013) with Thai script and Chinese glosses being omitted:[22][a]











cɤɤ, cɤʔ

to meet




濫 兮 抃 草 濫

ɦgraams ɦee brons tshuuʔ ɦgraams

glamx ɦee blɤɤn {cɤɤ, cɤʔ} glamx

evening PTCL joyful {to meet} evening

Oh, the fine night, we meet in happiness tonight!



we, I

thjang < khljang


be apt to

枑 澤

gaah draag

kraʔ - ʔdaak

shy, ashamed



we, I



be good at

tju < klju


to row

予 昌 {枑 澤} 予 昌 州

la {thjang < khljang} {gaah draag} la thjang {tju < klju}

raa djaangh {kraʔ - ʔdaak} raa djaangh cɛɛu

{we, I} {be apt to} {shy, ashamed} {we, I} {be good at} {to row}

I am so shy, ah! I am good at rowing.



to row




to cross



to row










胥 胥



satisfy, please

州 𩜱 州 焉 乎 秦 {胥 胥}

tju khaamʔ tju jen ɦaa dzin sa

cɛɛu khaamx cɛɛu jɤɤnh ɦaa djɯɯnh saʔ

{to row} {to cross} {to row} slowly PTCL joyful {satisfy, please}

Rowing slowly across the river, ah! I am so pleased!



dirty, ragged



we, I




tjau < kljau





Your Excellency







縵 予 乎 昭 澶 秦 踰

moons la ɦaa {tjau < kljau} daans dzin lo

mɔɔm raa ɦaa caux daanh djin ruux

{dirty, ragged} {we, I} PTCL prince {Your Excellency} acquainted know

Dirty though I am, ah! I made acquaintance with your highness the Prince.



to hide

djeʔ < gljeʔ





forever, constantly



to yearn




滲 惿 隨 河 湖

srɯms {djeʔ < gljeʔ} sɦloi gaai gaa

zumh caï rɯaih graih gaʔ

{to hide} heart {forever, constantly} {to yearn} PTCL

Hidden forever in my heart, ah! is my adoration and longing.

Some scattered non-Sinitic words found in the two ancient Chinese fictional texts, the Mu Tianzi Zhuan (Chinese: 穆天子傳) (4th c. B.C.) and the Yuejue shu (Chinese: 越絕書) (1st c. A.D.), can be compared to lexical items in Kra-Dai languages. These two texts are only preserved in corrupt versions and share a rather convoluted editorial history. Wolfgang Behr (2002) makes an attempt to identify the origins of those words:

“The say for ‘good’ and huăn for ‘way’, i.e. in their titles they follow the central kingdoms, but in their names they follow their own lords.”

< ʔjij < *bq(l)ij ← Siamese diiA1, Longzhou dai1, Bo'ai nii1 Daiya li1, Sipsongpanna di1, Dehong li6 < proto-Tai *ʔdɛiA1 | Sui ʔdaai1, Kam laai1, Maonan ʔdaai1, Mak ʔdaai6 < proto-Kam-Sui/proto-Kam-Tai *ʔdaai1 'good'

緩 [huăn] < hwanX < *awan ← Siamese honA1, Bo'ai hɔn1, Dioi thon1 < proto-Tai *xronA1| Sui khwən1-i, Kam khwən1, Maonan khun1-i, Mulam khwən1-i < proto-Kam-Sui *khwən1 'road, way' | proto-Hlai *kuun1 || proto-Austronesian *Zalan (Thurgood 1994:353)

jué < dzjwet < *bdzot ← Siamese codD1 'to record, mark' (Zhengzhang Shangfang 1999:8)

“The Middle mountains of are the mountains of the Yuè’s bronze office, the Yuè people call them ‘Bronze gū[gū]dú.”

「姑[沽]瀆」 gūdú < ku=duwk < *aka=alok

← Siamese kʰauA1 'horn', Daiya xau5, Sipsongpanna xau1, Dehong xau1, xău1, Dioi kaou1 'mountain, hill' < proto-Tai *kʰauA2; Siamese luukD2l 'classifier for mountains', Siamese kʰauA1-luukD2l 'mountain' || cf. OC < kuwk << *ak-lok/luwk < *akə-lok/yowk < *blok 'valley'

"... The Yuè people call a boat xūlú. (‘beard’ & ‘cottage’)"

< sju < *bs(n)o

? ← Siamese saʔ 'noun prefix'

< lu < *bra

← Siamese rɯaA2, Longzhou lɯɯ2, Bo'ai luu2, Daiya 2, Dehong 2 'boat' < proto-Tai *drɯ[a,o] | Sui lwa1/ʔda1, Kam lo1/lwa1, Be zoa < proto-Kam-Sui *s-lwa(n)A1 'boat'

"[Líu] Jiă (the king of Jīng 荆) built the western wall, it was called dìngcuò ['settle(d)' & 'grindstone'] wall."

dìng < dengH < *adeng-s

← Siamese diaaŋA1, Daiya tʂhəŋ2, Sipsongpanna tseŋ2, Malay (Austronesian) dindiŋ2, Tagalog diŋdiŋ2 wall'

cuò < tshak < *atshak

? ← Siamese tokD1s 'to set→sunset→west' (tawan-tok 'sun-set' = 'west'); Longzhou tuk7, Bo'ai tɔk7, Daiya tok7, Sipsongpanna tok7 < proto-Tai *tokD1s ǀ Sui tok7, Mak tok7, Maonan tɔk < proto-Kam-Sui *tɔkD1

Substrate in modern Chinese languages

Besides a limited number of lexical items left in Chinese historical texts, remnants of language(s) spoken by the ancient Yue can be found in non-Han substrata in Southern Chinese dialects, e.g.: Wu, Min, Hakka, Yue, etc. Robert Bauer (1987) identifies twenty seven lexical items in Yue, Hakka and Min varieties, which share Kra–Dai roots.[27] The following are some examples cited from Bauer (1987):[27]

Substrate in Cantonese

Yue-Hashimoto describes the Yue Chinese languages spoken in Guangdong as having a Tai influence.[28] Robert Bauer (1996) points out twenty nine possible cognates between Cantonese spoken in Guangzhou and Kra–Dai, of which seven cognates are confirmed to originate from Kra–Dai sources:[29]

Substrate in Wu Chinese

Li Hui (2001) finds 126 Kra-Dai cognates in Maqiao Wu dialect spoken in the suburbs of Shanghai out of more than a thousand lexical items surveyed.[36] According to the author, these cognates are likely traces of the Old Yue language.[36] The two tables below show lexical comparisons between Maqiao Wu dialect and Kra-Dai languages quoted from Li Hui (2001). He notes that, in Wu dialect, final consonants such as -m, -ɯ, -i, ụ, etc don't exist, and therefore, -m in Maqiao dialect tends to become -ŋ or -n, or it's simply absent, and in some cases -m even becomes final glottal stop.[37]

Kra-Dai Maqiao Wu
-m , -n become -ŋ
təŋ354 step 跺
fəŋ55 du53 snore/to snore 鼾
pəʔ33 ɕhaŋ435 to have fun (游) 玩
final consonant/vowel missing
ɑ:31 li33 still, yet 尚;还
tsɔ:435 to plow 犁(地)
dᴇ354 hole/pit 坑
53 filth 污垢
ɕhy55 zᴇ53 building/room 房子
kᴇ435 to draw close to 靠拢
435 to sway/to swing 摆动
ɕhɑ55 tsɑ53 capable/competent 能干
thɛ435 to crawl 爬
becoming final glottal stop -ʔ
lɔʔ33 below/down 下(雨)
tɕiʔ33 ku53 cheek 腮
kheʔ55 to press 按
kau33 son213
khəʔ55 tɕoŋ55 to doze/to nap 瞌睡
ʔdəʔ55 end/extremity 端
kuaʔ55 to split/to crack 裂
pəʔ33 ɕaŋ435 to have fun(游)玩
Kra-Dai Maqiao Wu
-m , -n become -ŋ
kaŋ354 to prop up/to brace 撑住
tshoŋ53 to bow the head 低头
final consonant/vowel missing
ve:55 to hang/to suspend 悬挂;吊
lu354 mountain/hill 山(地名用)
xun—55 (Dai)
ha:k55 (Zhuang)
5553 government official/official 官
55 mo53 tadpole 蝌蚪
435 fu53 classifier for times 趟;次
435 to tie up 拴(牛)
tsɿ55 to bow the head 低头
(ɣa:i42) ɕa:i42
ɕɑ:354 very, quite, much 很
becoming final glottal stop -ʔ
sa:ŋ33 səu53
seʔ33 zo55 ɦɯ11 wizard/magician 巫师
tɕiʔ55 ɕhiŋ55 market/bazaar 集市
pəʔ33 to move 搬
veʔ33 to pour 倒(水)
theʔ55 to weed 耘
teʔ55 to narrow one's eyes 眯
lɔʔ33 nɒn35 pitfall/to sink 陷
ɣa:i42 (ɕa:i42)
ʔɔʔ55 very/quite/much 很
thoʔ55 to cook/to boil 煮(肉)

Austroasiatic arguments

Jerry Norman and Mei Tsu-lin presented evidence that at least some Yue spoke an Austroasiatic language:[38][39][40]

They also provide evidence of an Austroasiatic substrate in the vocabulary of Min Chinese.[38][42] For example:

Norman and Mei's hypothesis has been criticized by Laurent Sagart, who demonstrates that many of the supposed loan words can be better explained as archaic Chinese words, or even loans from Austronesian languages; he also argues that the Vietic cradle must be located farther south in current north Vietnam.[10][47]

Moreover, Chamberlain (1998) posits that the Austroasiatic predecessor of the modern Vietnamese language originated in modern-day Bolikhamsai Province and Khammouane Province in Laos as well as parts of Nghệ An Province and Quảng Bình Province in Vietnam, rather than in the region north of the Red River Delta.[49] However, Ferlus (2009) showed that the inventions of pestle, oar and a pan to cook sticky rice, which is the main characteristic of the Đông Sơn culture, correspond to the creation of new lexicons for these inventions in Northern Vietic (Việt–Mường) and Central Vietic (Cuoi-Toum).[50] The new vocabularies of these inventions were proven to be derivatives from original verbs rather than borrowed lexical items. The current distribution of Northern Vietic also correspond to the area of Đông Sơn culture. Thus, Ferlus concludes that the Northern Vietic (Viet-Muong) speakers are the "most direct heirs" of the Dongsonians, who have resided in Southern part of Red River Delta and North Central Vietnam since the 1st millennium BC.[50] In addition, archaeogenetics demonstrated that before the Dong Son period, the Red River Delta's inhabitants were predominantly Austroasiatic: genetic data from Phùng Nguyên culture's burial site (dated to 1,800 BCE) at Mán Bạc (in present-day Ninh Bình Province, Vietnam) have close proximity to modern Austroasiatic speakers, while "mixed genetics" from Đông Sơn culture's Núi Nấp site showed affinity to "Dai from China, Tai-Kadai speakers from Thailand, and Austroasiatic speakers from Vietnam, including the Kinh"; these results indicated that significant contact happened between Tai speakers and Vietic speakers.[51]

Ye (2014) identified a few Austroasiatic loanwords in Ancient Chu dialect of Old Chinese.[52]

Writing system

There is no known evidence of a writing system among the Yue peoples of the Lingnan region in pre-Qin times, and the Chinese conquest of the region is believed to have introduced writing to the area. However, Liang Tingwang, a professor from the Central University of Nationalities, said that the ancient Zhuang had their own proto-writing system but had to give it up because of the Qinshi Emperor's tough policy and to adopt the Han Chinese writing system, which ultimately developed into the old Zhuang demotic script alongside the classical Chinese writing system, during the Tang dynasty (618–907).[53]


  1. ^ The upper row represents the original text, the next row the Old Chinese pronunciation, the third a transcription of written Thai, and the fourth line English glosses. Finally, there is Zhengzhang's English translation.
  2. ^ The second syllable na:3 may correspond to Tai morpheme for 'field'.


  1. ^ a b c Zhengzhang 1991, pp. 159–168.
  2. ^ Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (1999-03-13). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521470308.
  3. ^ Zhang & Huang, 320-321.
  4. ^ DeLancey, Scott (2011). "On the Origins of Sinitic". Proceedings of the 23rd North American Conference on Chinese Lingusitic. Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse. Vol. 1. pp. 51–64. doi:10.1075/scld.2.04del. ISBN 978-90-272-0181-2.
  5. ^ Enfield, N.J. (2005). "Areal Linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia" (PDF). Annual Review of Anthropology. 34: 181–206. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120406. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-167B-C. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-24. Retrieved 2013-06-05.
  6. ^ LaPolla, Randy J. (2010). Language Contact and Language Change in the History of the Sinitic Languages. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6858-6868.
  7. ^ a b c Sagart 2008, p. 143.
  8. ^ "Some thoughts on the problem of the Austro-Asiatic homeland" (PDF). Peiros (2011).
  9. ^ Reconstructing Austroasiatic prehistory; Chapter in the forthcoming Jenny, M. & P. Sidwell (eds.). forthcoming 2015. Handbook of the Austroasiatic Languages. Leiden: Brill. (Page 1: “Sagart (2011) and Bellwood (2013) favour the middle Yangzi”)
  10. ^ a b Sagart 2008, pp. 141–145.
  11. ^ Behr, Wolfgang (2009). "Dialects, diachrony, diglossia or all three? Tomb text glimpses into the language(s) of Chǔ", TTW-3, Zürich, 26.-29.VI.2009, “Genius loci”
  12. ^ Meacham, William (1996). "Defining the Hundred Yue". Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association. 15: 93–100. doi:10.7152/bippa.v15i0.11537.
  13. ^ a b c Chamberlain (2016)
  14. ^ Pittayaporn 2012, pp. 47–64.
  15. ^ Kiernan 2019, p. 84.
  16. ^ Blench, Roger (2018). Tai-Kadai and Austronesian Are Related at Multiple Levels and Their Archaeological Interpretation (Draft) – via Academia.edu. The volume of cognates between Austronesian and Daic, notably in fundamental vocabulary, is such that they must be related. Borrowing can be excluded as an explanation
  17. ^ Chamberlain (2016), p. 67
  18. ^ Gerner, Matthias (2014). Project Discussion: The Austro-Tai Hypothesis. The 14th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-14) (PDF). The 14th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL -14). p. 158.
  19. ^ Holm 2013, p. 785.
  20. ^ a b Edmondson 2007, p. 16.
  21. ^ Edmondson 2007, p. 17.
  22. ^ Holm 2013, pp. 784–785.
  23. ^ Behr 2002, pp. 1–2.
  24. ^ a b Behr 2002, p. 2.
  25. ^ Behr 2002, pp. 2–3.
  26. ^ Behr 2002, p. 3.
  27. ^ a b Bauer, Robert S. (1987). 'Kadai loanwords in southern Chinese dialects', Transactions of the International Conference of Orientalists in Japan 32: 95–111.
  28. ^ Yue-Hashimoto, Anne Oi-Kan (1972), Studies in Yue Dialects 1: Phonology of Cantonese, Cambridge University Press, p. 6, ISBN 978-0-521-08442-0
  29. ^ Bauer (1996), pp. 1835–1836.
  30. ^ Bauer (1996), pp. 1822–1823.
  31. ^ Bauer (1996), p. 1823.
  32. ^ Bauer (1996), p. 1826.
  33. ^ a b Bauer (1996), p. 1827.
  34. ^ Bauer (1996), pp. 1828–1829.
  35. ^ Bauer (1996), p. 1834.
  36. ^ a b Li 2001, p. 15.
  37. ^ Li 2001, p. 19.
  38. ^ a b Norman, Jerry; Mei, Tsu-lin (1976). "The Austroasiatics in Ancient South China: Some Lexical Evidence" (PDF). Monumenta Serica. 32: 274–301. doi:10.1080/02549948.1976.11731121. JSTOR 40726203.
  39. ^ Norman, Jerry (1988). Chinese. Cambridge University Press. pp. 17–19. ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3.
  40. ^ Boltz, William G. (1999). "Language and Writing". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.). The Cambridge history of ancient China: from the origins of civilization to 221 B.C.. Cambridge University Press. pp. 74–123. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8.
  41. ^ Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus
  42. ^ Norman (1988), pp. 18–19, 231
  43. ^ Norman (1988), pp. 18–19.
  44. ^ Norman & Mei (1976), pp. 296–297.
  45. ^ Norman (1981), p. 63.
  46. ^ Norman & Mei (1976), pp. 297–298.
  47. ^ Sagart 2008, p. 165-190.
  48. ^ a b c d e Sagart 2008, p. 142.
  49. ^ Chamberlain, J.R. 1998, "The origin of Sek: implications for Tai and Vietnamese history", in The International Conference on Tai Studies, ed. S. Burusphat, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 97-128. Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.
  50. ^ a b Ferlus, Michael (2009). "A Layer of Dongsonian Vocabulary in Vietnamese" (PDF). Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. 1: 95–108.
  51. ^ Alves 2019, p. 7.
  52. ^ Ye, Xiaofeng (叶晓锋) (2014). 上古楚语中的南亚语成分 (Austroasiatic elements in ancient Chu dialect). 《民族语文》. 3: 28-36.
  53. ^ Huang, Bo (2017). Comprehensive Geographic Information Systems, Elsevier, p. 162.


Further reading

  • Zhengzhang Shangfang 1999. "An Interpretation of the Old Yue Language Written in Goujiàn's Wéijiă lìng" [句践"维甲"令中之古越语的解读]. In Minzu Yuwen 4, pp. 1–14.
  • Zhengzhang Shangfang 1998. "Gu Yueyu" 古越語 [The old Yue language]. In Dong Chuping 董楚平 et al. Wu Yue wenhua zhi 吳越文化誌 [Record of the cultures of Wu and Yue]. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 253–281.
  • Zhengzhang Shangfang 1990. "Some Kam-Tai Words in Place Names of the Ancient Wu and Yue States" [古吴越地名中的侗台语成份]. In Minzu Yuwen 6.